1233: Reduction of Relative Clauses Apr 25, 2018

It's a quirk of English that certain relative clauses do not require the use of 'that' (or 'who(m)' if it's about a person) such as in "his is the dog [that] bit me' where is is optional. In other languages such as German, these relative pronouns are always necessary in these same structures. However, this sort of abbreviation, so to speak, doesn't end here; some relative clauses can be rephrased from "that [subject] [verb]" into the more simple "to [verb]“ such as "it is important that [you] win" or "it is important to win".
To see some hypothetical Word Facts, visit Patreon.com/wordfacts. Check out the latest Youtube video too: https://youtu.be/T18K38h2ZHc
Previous
Previous

1234: sample and example Apr 26, 2018

Next
Next

1232: Are Filler Words Actually Words? Apr 24, 2018